My lack of technical knowledge has shrunk considerably since using this package, the first webs looked great but lacked some of the bells a whistles other software offers, however this package allows add ins and editing in a way that can create very attractive web sites. As with all MS software, the simple intuitive elements get you going and then with time so much more can be done. I disagree with many of the negative comments, FrontPage can work with most browsers including Netscape but you need to use the correct settings, given that only 10% of people use Netscape it's not a real issue. Bugs aside it's the best simple to use web package around. I'm looking forward to the next version with even more easy to use features. A cheap and effective ... Read More:
>>More Details
My lack of technical knowledge has shrunk considerably since using this package, the first webs looked great but lacked some of the bells a whistles other software offers, however this package allows add ins and editing in a way that can create very attractive web sites. As with all MS software, the simple intuitive elements get you going and then with time so much more can be done. I disagree with many of the negative comments, FrontPage can work with most browsers including Netscape but you need to use the correct settings, given that only 10% of people use Netscape it's not a real issue. Bugs aside it's the best simple to use web package around. I'm looking forward to the next version with even more easy to use features. A cheap and effective ... Read More:
>>More Details
My lack of technical knowledge has shrunk considerably since using this package, the first webs looked great but lacked some of the bells a whistles other software offers, however this package allows add ins and editing in a way that can create very attractive web sites. As with all MS software, the simple intuitive elements get you going and then with time so much more can be done. I disagree with many of the negative comments, FrontPage can work with most browsers including Netscape but you need to use the correct settings, given that only 10% of people use Netscape it's not a real issue. Bugs aside it's the best simple to use web package around. I'm looking forward to the next version with even more easy to use features. A cheap and effective ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details
I don't understand why Expression Web has grown in popularity. Microsoft really have come up trumps for once. Its a small install, way smaller than Dreamweaver, intuaitive and incredibly effective. Its also massivley cheaper than Adobe's baby.
I have used Dreamweaver for sometime and it now seems to have gone the way of most Microsoft offerings. Its bloated, too complicated and annoyingly produces messy propriety code. It also has restritive licensing and poor upgrade routes.
Expression Web just churns out fully XHTML compliant code and doesn't even add anything in the meta data to say its produced it (very unusual these days). It links well with ASP pages and has enough .net snippets in there for those who want the power of asp ... Read More:
>>More Details